Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Goncalves

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:03, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Julian Goncalves

Julian Goncalves (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

A non notable actor/performer. This has previously been deleted (not through AfD) and I don't think the subject has become any more notable in the meantime. The article is original research and I suspect partly a vanity project Mattinbgn/ ^talk 22:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Mattinbgn/ ^talk 22:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Agree with nom - WP:BIO applies. Being a student at WAAPA is no different to being a uni student. Orderinchaos 01:09, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Per Orderinchaos, WP:BIO applies. And while WAAPA may be a notable institution, the notability does not cascade down to unaccomplished individuals. Thewinchester ^(talk) 05:10, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I don't know how accomplished Julian is and I'm sure he can act better than me. However, no reliable secondary sources so notability is not established. Better sources needed. Assize 11:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete He plans to eventually move overseas and try establish himself as a performer when he does, people will write about him and there will be references to support an article.Garrie 23:25, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. When he's established, let's see a proper article about him. --Oscarthecat 12:15, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per WP:Bio. While this young performer may have a brilliant career ahead, there is jsut not enough yet to warrant an article. —Gaff ^ταλκ 22:21, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, possible vanity article for a non-notable person. Lankiveil 07:57, 31 May 2007 (UTC).

Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:03, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.