Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Clarke

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Julian Clarke

Julian Clarke (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Some assertions of notability provided, preventing speedy, but I can find nothing to indicate that they're true. "Julian Clarke" turns up many hits on Google, but none appearing to relate to this guy, and certainly no reliable sources corroborating anything. "Music label" has an article here (likely soon to be speedied), indicating that it's the subject's own "secret project", and similarly turns up very little. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 00:53, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

  • delete Just a self promotion article? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DannyDoodles (talk • contribs) 07:49, 16 February 2007 (UTC).
  • Delete This is self-promotion by someone who has yet to do anything notable. Lesnail 01:36, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Vanity page. -- Chairman S. Talk Contribs 05:51, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless sourced i.a.w. WP:V and WP:BIO or WP:MUSIC by end of this AfD Alf photoman 15:27, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I agree with the nomination and see this as just vanity. --Kevin Murray 19:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
  • delete...though where did he invent the artist's template on the left? Not an excuse to leave it standing, but few self-promoters might put the template up of themselves. At least they attempted to make it look like a decent article, rather than a straight forward POV ad. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Martianlostinspace (talk • contribs) 19:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC).
    • Comment You ought to see some of the spam articles that come in on newpage patrol. Some of them are actually quite pretty. (Of course, they're still off about how we "leverage this for the benefit of our clients" and such...) Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 02:58, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.