Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Earl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted by user:Phil Sandifer. Non-admin close by Flyguy649 ^talk _contribs 04:54, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Julia Earl

Julia Earl (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This is a disputed prod; the rationale was "private individual involved in a single incident of local intrigue, not notable to the point of inclusion in an encyclopedia, requesting deletion OTRS" Kappa 06:18, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete As I see it, the subject has had no non-local coverage, and has not had a significant non-local effect on anything, so there's a strong lack of notability. Calgary 06:40, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - too local to be on the encyclopedia. --Hirohisat ^Talk 06:56, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. Fails WP:PSEUDO, WP:COATRACK and WP:BLP1E; if anyone could suggest an appropriate place then merge, otherwise delete.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 15:43, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable. All coverage is local. The article exists merely to attack Julia Earl. -- Kainaw^(what?) 18:27, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
• Not a disputed prod. This was speediable, and I speedied it. I have re-speedied, as it was still speediable due to BLP issues, which were always the issue there. Phil Sandifer 01:08, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.