Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Moses

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (closed by non-admin). RMHED (talk) 19:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Judith Moses

Judith Moses (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article about a political candidate who has not yet been elected to office and thus fails WP:Bio#Politicians. Ros0709 (talk) 20:24, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Something went badly wrong in AfD creation! Fixed above. Ros0709 (talk) 20:29, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep (withdrawal of nomination). Please see my reasoning for withdrawing my nomination of Leah Lawrence. Although a different election the same reasoning seems to apply. Plus, I'm less convinced now than I was that this individual fails notability due to her other achievements. Ros0709 (talk) 20:45, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment. This appears to be a case of Wikipedia being used to raise the profile of a political candidate. Similar action was rightly stamped on here. Ros0709 (talk) 20:59, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep on the basis of her work as a government official, consultant and lobbyist. --Eastmain (talk) 01:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep as she is a recognized Federal Liberal Candidate and is registered by Elections Canada to seek the position of Member of Parliament for her Federal Riding in the 40th Canadian General Election. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.250.83.50 (talk) 23:25, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  • I'm going against the grain here, but I think this one is a delete. She will be the candidate, yes, but the election hasn't even been called yet. Google.com had many hits for many different people with the same name, but a search of Canadian sites found few hits, and most of those were just local coverage of her announcement that she is the future candidate. She has had some high-level beaurocratic positions, but not enough to meet WP:BIO. I actually hope that she wins the seat, but I really don't think that she's notable enough for an article here (yet?). --Dawn bard (talk) 16:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.