Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judge Mark Gempeler

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. JeremyA (talk) 19:27, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Judge Mark Gempeler

Not notable Just A Normal judge who precided over a Not So Big trial Delete--Aranda56 05:05, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Interesting. Are all judges de facto notable? I think probably not unless they have presided over a particularly notable case(s) or done something that otherwise establishes their notability. The case would have to be on the way to the O.J. Simpson scale I think. Not knowing my sport very well, and Google not offering anything obvious regarding the importance of the trial, I'll notvote delete-with-persuadability. -Splash 17:24, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable judge. Judges are no more notable inherently than doctors or priests. -- BD2412 ^talk 20:02, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Next: college professors. -- Kjkolb 06:10, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.