Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judd Bagley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:17, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Judd Bagley

Judd Bagley (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Fails WP:BIO. Notability is claimed on a personal resume that does not directly address the claim in the article. Remaining edits by article creator suggest WP:COI with a personal interest in describing the article subject as a means of spamming Overstock.com naked-short-selling information. ju66l3r 16:57, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as spam of attack website by obvious sockpuppet of banned user, in addition to factors cited in nom. Article on this non-notable corporate official is by new user account that is, in all probabilty, banned User:WordBomb. Note new user's appearance, out of the blue, on my user page[1], followed by magical appearance of user purporting to be Bagley [2]. Article makes references to author Gary Weiss, an obsession of WordBomb, even though Weiss not mentioned in the linked NY Post article. The primary purpose of this article is to spam antisocialmedia.net attack website, which has made vicious personal attacks on Wikipedia administrators and editors, myself included. Additionally, the notability claim is based on Bagley being a "speechwriter for Jeb Bush." He was not, as per linked resume. He worked in PR for the Florida government.--Mantanmoreland 17:53, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above GabrielF 00:17, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 00:55, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:15, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per above. Amoruso 11:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- Two links to linkedin.com (kind-of like myspace.com?) plus two links to writings in the NY Post (a popular daily paper but not exactly scholarly) does not justify an encyclopedia article. Keesiewonder 11:29, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per above. Kneale 11:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Mantanmoreland. Beit Or 23:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.