Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judas of Slavdom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. → Ξxtreme Unction {^yakł_blah} 23:23, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Judas of Slavdom

See also Talk:Judas of Slavdom. mikka (t) 22:06, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

• del. The term in its exactness is used in a handful of places as an interpretation of a word in a certain Slavophilic poem. The contents perfectly fit for anti-Polonism article. In other words, merge, no redirect.mikka (t) 00:32, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia:Guide to deletion. Finishing a merge requires placement of a redirect. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:19, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

• del the article (no redirect). Add whatever's appropriate to anti-Polonism. Could also be used for a separate To Slavs article about Tyutchev's poem. But this article isn't salvageable. --Irpen 22:10, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - not notable neologism (no Google hits except Wikipedia and its mirrors), whatever salvagable can be used in the anti-Polonism article or the new To Slavs article abakharev 23:13, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Always wondered whats up with this article. EscapeArtistsNeverDie 01:39, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. ←Humus sapiens←ну? 03:45, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete the term coined by Molobo per Wikipedia:No original research --Ghirlandajo 08:30, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Nope-term found in at least two books on Googleprint:[1] --Molobo 12:39, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. 8 Google hits, including 1 (one) not from Wikipedia or mirrors. Of course, that the Polish reluctance to embrace Pan-Slavism under Czarist leadership was seen as an act of betrayal of the Slavic cause is an established and undisputed fact. However, that does not make this article, with a coinage in the title and some incoherent brainstorming in the body, legitimate in any way. --Thorsten1 13:29, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
• Move to To Slavs or To Slavs (poem), expand on the poem itself and not its interpretation and delete the redir. Halibutt 02:23, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, original "research". Pavel Vozenilek 22:24, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Move per Halibutt.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 05:43, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
• Merge as per Mikka and Irpen. --Wojsyl ^(talk) 15:30, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
• Move per Piotrus.--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 08:51, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, I can't see any salvageable content. Leithp (talk) 08:58, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.