Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JuCo Express

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 08:47, Dec. 26, 2005

[edit] JuCo Express

Vanity page for a fantasy football team. (ESkog)^(Talk) 22:18, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

And a crappy fantasy football team at that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.5.234.210 (talk • contribs)

• Delete per nom Zzzzz 00:37, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete As per the nomination. --Wingsandsword 08:11, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: This nomination has been vandalized to change votes. To our anonymous friends, please do not change other people's comments anywhere on Wikipedia, especially here. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:14, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• ESKOG WHO MADE YOU GOD!!!??? WHO ARE YOU TO JUDGE!?!?!? WHAT HAVE YOU CONTRIBUTED??????!?!? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.73.152.81 (talk • contribs)
  • Well, no one made me God. That's why we vote here, to see if there is a consensus about this article's status in Wikipedia. (ESkog)^(Talk) 20:42, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

• • There is no basis for deleting this site, (ESkog), so I think that it should stay. FAntasy football is a cultural phenomenon and vanity plays a part to be sure, but early entries into the COLLEGE fantasy football realm are essential to understanding sociological man in the early 21st century. Plus, it's funny. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.53.119.232 (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.