Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jseamless

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 06:36, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jseamless

Jseamless (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

"A very new project" but not clear what on earth it is. No context. No notability. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:00, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. No sources to establish notability. UI abstraction is PRODed as well, for basically the same reasons. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 19:58, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete for WP:CRYSTALBALLERY - actually I wondered if it was simply a joke, but I think it is real ... possibly also very dull, but that is not a reason for deletion. Springnuts (talk) 21:01, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
• KeepI'm not sure if this is where I should post in response, but I'm the creator of this Wikipedia entry and it references the jSeamless Java framework (http://jseamless.org). I've added additional information to further explain what jSeamless is. Please tell me what else I need to add validate this entry in your opinion? It is similar on several planes to Openlaszlo and Echo_Framework that have remained on Wikipedia. Please tell me what these other entries provide that the jSeamless entry does not so I can fix it. Further, this may make less sense to you if you're not a programmer. This is intended primarily for Java developers and I've added some further clarification to the entry so there's no confusion. Darkfrog26 (talk) 21:24, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

• response - I think you might do well to read (and apply) WP:YFA - quickly! Or, read some deletion discussions to see what other wikipedians say about articles you do not have an interest in. Springnuts (talk) 23:28, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
• response - I have read that and though it is promoting a project, it is an open-source one and the reason I believe it belongs on Wikipedia is because it is such a new idea and conceptually nearly unheard of. Part of the purpose of the article is to publicize the concept of UI abstraction, that although very new, is the way development seems to be moving. Darkfrog26 (talk) 15:00, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

• I'd like to also mention that the request for deletion of "UI abstraction" as an entry is un-contested by me (the creator of that entry) and I've removed any reference to it from the jSeamless entry. Darkfrog26 (talk) 21:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
• KeepI don't see why this is any less note-worthy than the several other competing technologies out there. While I am not personally familiar with this specific framework, I found several other frameworks on Wikipedia that do exactly the same thing.Meltonkt (talk) 23:23, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 03:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.