Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joyful Child Foundation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Korath (Talk) 20:46, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Joyful Child Foundation

Seems like a vanity article. Non-notable organization. My vote is delete. Spinboy 03:07, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep. Samantha Runnion was just up for deletion a few days ago. This article was created as a result of a suggestion in that VfD debate. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Samantha Runnion. --Idont Havaname 04:17, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Organization appears to be notable and worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia (IMHO). —RaD Man (talk) 04:27, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. They were on GMA. - RedWordSmith 04:32, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Samaritan 04:56, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, less than 240 Google hits - sorry just isnt notable enough. Megan1967 06:48, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. I wrote this article after Katefan0 and Idont Havaname suggested that we merge the Samantha Runnion article into an article on the Joyful Child Foundation. I created this article as a consequence - I have no connection with it. My personal preference was to keep the article as it was a widely reported case and the trial is still ongoing with the potential for it to be a capital case going on for years. As the Foundation has 50 childwatch programs established in Southern California with plans to do more, I thought it was notable enough for Wikipedia. Capitalistroadster 13:07, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Philip 15:41, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. I see no reason to delete a page on a non-profit with a fairly significant outreach and that has links to a crime that had some news coverage. Katefan0 18:32, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and allow for organic growth. GRider\talk 20:10, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Notable enough for inclusion. Carrp | Talk 04:11, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.