Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Sonett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 04:20, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Joshua Sonett

Joshua Sonett (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article fails WP:BIO. Article was created by an WP:SPA account with no other edits other than related to columbiasurgery.org. possible copyvio http://www.columbiasurgery.org/about/dir_staff.html. Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article.Hu12 (talk) 07:07, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —Espresso Addict (talk) 23:00, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
• Weak keep. Full professor. Medline finds 45 papers for "JR Sonett", nearly all of which seem to be his, predominantly in respected subject-specific journals, including several reviews. Google Scholar finds 79 & 66 citations for two of his papers, and a further five with >20 citations. Operating on Clinton suggests leadership in his surgical field.[1] Borderline, but probably meets WP:PROF. Espresso Addict (talk) 03:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Espresso Addict (talk) 03:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. Let's check him against the WP:PROF criteria:

1) Two New York Times articles mentioned in article. Plenty more at Google News.

2-4) Demonstrated by his citation record.

5) The work on EDC organs.

6) Awards are listed in the article.

Remember that only of these is required to pass WP:PROF. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

• speedy keep I think itsclear by now that these were not reasonable nominations. DGG (talk) 00:43, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.