Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph K. Wright

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE (early close, likely A7) . gren グレン 13:03, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Joseph K. Wright

Looks like a misguided attempt to start a personal webpage, images are way too big, poorly written, does not begin to establish notability and is likely a vanity page (user has only edited this page). Daniel Case 04:31, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Note to closing admin: Don't forget to delete related images and check the user's upload log for more. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:17, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, and after all of the effort I took to no source notify him! gren グレン 04:33, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Normally I would say Userfy, but in this case just Delete or even Speedy. -- JJay 04:58, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. CSD A7. Unremarkable people. An article about a real person that does not assert that person's importance or significance. •DanMS 05:05, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete looks like nice folks, but lack notability for their own encyclopedic article.--MONGO 05:55, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete possibly speedy as non-notable Australian surfer. While a Google search for "Joseph Wright" surfer came up with over 500 hits, not many were about this guy. [1]Capitalistroadster 06:04, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Roisterer 06:10, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• "
• Delete per nom. novacatz 06:26, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 06:15, 21 December 2005 (UTC)"
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a free webhost. Userfication should be reserved for misguided newbies who also contributed to other articles and show an interest in actually sticking around. Otherwise the webhost abuse would just move to the userspaces. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:17, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete speedy speedy speedy! pfctdayelise 12:49, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.