Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Bloch
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Krimpet (talk) 03:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Joseph Bloch
Article was tagged for notability back in January, no substantial information has been added to the article since then. Subject is "active in Science Fiction fandom," but there is no indication in the article that he is notable. Fails WP:N janejellyroll 01:10, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Del no proof of WP:N~ G1ggy! Reply 05:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly fails WP:BIO and a g-search shows no notability. Eusebeus 06:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Fails to pass notability by virtue of lack of 2ndary sources. the_undertow talk 06:53, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:BIO--Dacium 07:18, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:BIO Sr13 (T|C) 09:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Seems to assert notability but obviously cannot demonstrate such after 4 months. JodyB 14:41, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm sorry, your time has expired to assert notability. Realkyhick 18:23, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - heh, I saw this article mentioned on Fark.com yesterday and wondered how long it would last... I don't see notability backed up with sources. Tony Fox (arf!) 19:12, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Utterly pointless Tonyf12 20:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This is actually about me, and I agree. I don't know why someone created it in the first place. -Joe Bloch --24.115.182.245 19:20, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
