Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonothan Ryan de Alwis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. -- Longhair\talk 01:46, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Jonothan Ryan de Alwis
Hoax, not on the Forbes list, in fact there are no Google hits at all. Also no hits at BBC. And the third link is to an article about Branson. VirtualDelight 08:09, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete per WP:V. --LAZY 1L 09:59, 20 September 2007 (UTC)sockpuppet GRBerry 03:31, 24 September 2007 (UTC)- Delete per nom. It does say it all. No ghits, even using the most general possible search terms FlowerpotmaN·(t) 21:21, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Bfigura (talk) 01:58, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - This and other bio referencing "Heavenly Pictures" e.g. Harrison Christian appear to be hoaxes, using non-existant references (shortfilms.com does not exist). dramatic 09:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. This is a hoax, and well done VirtualDelight in its detection and exposure. Sam Blacketer 09:24, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, obviously a hoax. No Google hits, and the one online reference doesn't mention Alwis.-gadfium 09:23, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions. —gadfium 09:23, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- delete more hoaxage from kiwi vandal, see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Razjou & Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harrison Christian. Pete.Hurd 03:03, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
