Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Munday

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. — Scientizzle 16:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jonathan Munday

Jonathan Munday (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete non-notable, has not made the requisite appearances in the Football League under notability guidelines for football players. Jonesy702 (talk) 00:03, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment- Just a quick note on the reason behind this Afd. Jonesy702 has listed this article for deletion in retaliation for the fact that I instigated an Afd on an article he was heavily involved with (see the deletion discussion here). For his future reference I would like to point out that Wikipedia is not a battleground.

However, I cannot argue with the Afd- under current guidelines Munday fails notability criteria. It is worth noting that under the new guidelines proposed in this discussion Munday would meet the notability criteria, but consensus has yet to be reached on this matter. Either way, I won't be losing any sleep over this. Simon KHFC (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment - With regards to Simon’s above childish comment, my nomination to delete this article has nothing, whatsoever to do with the recently deletion of one the pages I used to regularly update.

I’m sorry if I’m coming across a bit bitchy, but I can’t believe what I have just read in the above comment. It's nice to see you have taken the time to check me out... any chance of a christmas card do you think? Jonesy702 (talk) 20:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:34, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete. Three appearences in the Conference aren't notable either by the old or the proposed guidelines. Sebisthlm (talk) 12:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment- The first of the proposed guidelines states "has played for a fully professional club at a national level of the league structure". Munday has met those criteria. Simon KHFC (talk) 13:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment - Since when was the Conference National a fully professional league? Jonesy702 18:51, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

He didn't say it was. He said "has played for a fully professional club at a national level of the league structure" - Kidderminster are a fully pro club and the Conf Nat is a nationwide league..... ChrisTheDude 21:30, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

I know... but what has that got to do with the price of fish? Point is, it doesn't qualify. Jonesy702 16:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - doesn't meet current WP:BIO criteria. - fchd (talk) 18:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 12:59, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. ArtVandelay13 (talk) 20:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.