Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Meier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:50, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jonathan Meier

Not notable - please see article talk page for extended reasoning. -- Argon233 ^T _@ ^C _¶ ^U _∠  04:17, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom Tony Bruguier 04:19, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Royboycrashfan 05:07, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Khoikhoi 05:24, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Gu 11:40, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, low googles but can't help noticing the press coverage. [1], [2], [3] and there's more. Article sucks and is out of date but, as many will point out, that's not a reason to delete a notable topic. And hey, I beat Monicasdude to a "keep" :-0 Deizio 23:52, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete low googles, and although there is press coverage, not enough to really be striking. If more coverage in the future maybe this person would warrant a page. Not now.  :( Lonesomedovechocolate 02:19, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.