Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Bowers (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:29, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Jonathan Bowers
Nominated by 131.107.0.73 apparently due to concerns of notability. Previous discussion resulted in no consensus. I have no opinion. --- RockMFR 05:48, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete unless non-trivial sources are added to the article. Even if it survives this AfD in present form it will be nominated again for lack of verifiability Alf photoman 17:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Not Noteable. Although he has contributed some ideas to math with the help of others and writes extensively on such subjects as an amateur, this does not make him notable. There are many many mathematicians both amateur and professional that have made larger more notable contributions than this guy. He just likes to use the internet to promote himself. How about providing a publication list??? Many amateurs that are serious and capable get published in peer reviewed journals. And on a final note: keep up the good work Johnathan (in math that is)--Nick Y. 22:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete unless reliable sources are added. WP:V isn't negotiable. One Night In Hackney 12:18, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
