Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Nathanson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 01:46, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jon Nathanson

Speedy tagged removed several times by editors User:Bobby Love and User:Donkeyton. The article appears to be a repost of deleted material (see here). It's a completely unverified hoax. See the article talk page for Google search results that indicate that the subject is not a celebrity. I've even been given a laughable "warning" by User:Bobby Love on my own talk page (see here), a self-described "senior editor" with a dozen contributions to date. Scientizzle 20:36, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

• Darn those senior editors! It actually isn't a repost[1] but it is a shameless hoax, I'm weary of anything that has a myspace link[2]. Ridiculous two team hoax, Delete. Yanksox 21:18, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Duly noted--striked repost reference...I shoulda checked there myself. Thanks. -- Scientizzle 21:22, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - yes seems to be a hoax - I'm slightly more concerned that new contributors to wikipedia could be put off by people passing themselves off as "Senior editors" - can anything be done? Should anything be done? --Charlesknight 21:20, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per talk page discussion (277 hits on Google) and a LOL @ Bobby Love's assertion that he could ban Scientizzle. Hbdragon88 00:24, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as obvious hoax, and I'm not becoming a senior editor, damnit, unless I get a senior discount to go with it. --Calton | Talk 07:39, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator, hoax, and a non-notable one at that. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:43, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per all of the above; hoax, no references. If its true I'm jealous... I wish I was linked romantically to numerous female celebs! Easter rising 16:45, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• delete please it is a hoax with no references Yuckfoo 01:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.