Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Dowd
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to MVP Baseball series#Players. Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:56, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Jon Dowd
Notability on this topic is shaky; even within the sports gaming community, it's only a minor curiosity. I'm not sure there's any info on the page worth merging into Barry Bonds or any of the respective game's pages, either. — BorgHunter (talk) 05:00, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I don't see why this couldn't be mentioned in MVP Baseball series. There are sources available [1]. Zagalejo^^^ 05:09, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- It already is. I meant that I don't think there's any additional information in the Dowd article that should be included in the MVP Baseball article. Sorry, it's late and I'm not articulating things very clearly, it seems. — BorgHunter (talk) 05:13, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- This could still be a redirect to that page. No need for deletion tools. Zagalejo^^^ 05:14, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed, but enough people worked on the page that I felt some discussion was appropriate before just chucking it and going the redirect route, hence the AfD. It does date back to 2005, after all. — BorgHunter (talk) 05:21, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- This could still be a redirect to that page. No need for deletion tools. Zagalejo^^^ 05:14, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- It already is. I meant that I don't think there's any additional information in the Dowd article that should be included in the MVP Baseball article. Sorry, it's late and I'm not articulating things very clearly, it seems. — BorgHunter (talk) 05:13, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 18:33, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect: not notable, might even be original research. I have no clue what to make of this article, but I trust the compromise set out above. Randomran (talk) 16:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete all unreferenced material per WP:V policy. The only external link is related to an attempt at original research. Marasmusine (talk) 13:36, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
