Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jologs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:30, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jologs

Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and even if it were, an article with no reliable sources and questionable authenticity wouldn't belong. --Hetar 03:41, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, & WP:OR.Bridesmill 03:58, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete has only a vague relationship to English, which is probably not the creator's fault, but the fact that it's a dicdef is unavoidable. Opabinia regalis 04:44, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Steel 22:49, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Zos 04:18, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.