Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnstone Burgh FCBC 1993

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--JForget 00:50, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Johnstone Burgh FCBC 1993

Johnstone Burgh FCBC 1993 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

poorly written, doesnt seem to be a notable club, google gives 40 results... Phgao 13:00, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

  • KEEP - I don't know where Phgao is from but in many parts of Scotland this is a notable & formidable football team. I'll admit they're are only 4 or 5 notable players (including John FitzGerald) and google doesn't give much about them but that doesn't mean their not a notable football team. I am currently editing the article to try and improve the quality of writing & improve the amount & quality of information given —Preceding unsigned comment added by DLB 4 eva (talk • contribs) 13:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
  • KEEP - these sources (websites) are reliable, not too informing but still reliable

http://135.196.23.137/pls/gn/V3_Club_Stats.TEAM_Results?partner_id=134&team_id=44138 http://www.paisleygazette.co.uk/article.php?sec=2&id=16199 http://www.wikimapia.org/#lat=55.835899&lon=-4.492411&z=18&l=0&m=a&v=2 http://paisleydistrictyfl.netfirms.com/15s_fixtures.htm http://www.scottishyouthfa.co.uk/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by DLB 4 eva (talk • contribs) 14:29, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete, no claim to notability. Punkmorten 14:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
  • KEEP - it does claim notability, maybe not to a worldwide standard but in the west of Scotland this team is very notable. unfortunately their notable for being rubbish, but being tremendously bad is still notable. Now they are becoming notable for being a good team —Preceding unsigned comment added by DLB 4 eva (talk • contribs) 15:02, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Looking at the list of other competitors in the Paisley and District, I see that most of them are identified as U15 sides. If this is a youth league, there's no way its teams meet the notability standards for football clubs. If I'm misreading the situation, please let us know. -- BPMullins | Talk 15:41, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - While it is true the majority of this league are U-15 it is the best league of its kind with all the teams taking part being of a decent standard & the best of them feed players through to profesional teams country (such as Celtic, Aberdeen & Dundee United). This league notable as it is not just teams from near the town of Paisley as the name sugests, it include teams such as Oban Saints, who for an away game have to travel for at least 3 hours to play the team most local to them. This is becuase the P&D league takes only the best teams from this district. All the teams in this league are notable but I have chosen Johnstone Burgh because of their success in the blackpool tournament & because while other teams are declining The Burgh are getting better & better. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DLB 4 eva (talk • contribs)
  • Delete per nom. WP:NN football club. --Evb-wiki 16:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
  • This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. пﮟოьεԻ 57 16:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete This appears to be the Boys' Club (BC) of the main Johnstone Burgh FC and are therefore non-notable. пﮟოьεԻ 57 16:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - a long, long way from being notable. - fchd 17:13, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - a regional U15 team is nowhere near passing notability standards. Simon KHFC 17:22, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete kids' sports team. Surely these can be speedied. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - non-notable. GiantSnowman 20:18, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I see no notability and no significance or importance to warrant an article in an encyclopedia. --Malcolmxl5 21:29, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - non-notable. Sebisthlm 22:44, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per everyone else, I'm sure they're a great bunch of lads, but they have no place on WP ChrisTheDude 21:19, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete per nominator and above comments. Qwghlm 20:38, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.