Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John William Chandler III

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete by User:Sarah Ewart. ColourBurst 04:42, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] John William Chandler III

Yet Another Blogger (a student writing on boxing) "who is quickly gaining notoriety". No particular actual fame, as yet. Scores the Magic Google Goose Egg: NO hits in Google or Google Blog, and the site he writes for gets 11 Google Blog hits. Was prodded, but tag removed by VivianDarkbloom (talk · contribs) with the summary "because I don't trust the prodder or his judgement" -- one of a series of prod tag removals with the same summary in an some sort of disruption to make a point. Calton | Talk 01:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete non-notable blogger. Vivian Darkbloom blahblahblah WP:POINT etc. Bwithh 01:55, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete It's tough to get less notable than this. It's |_| that close to a speedy deletion candidate. The kid barely graduated high school, for pete's sake. It's hard to make yourself known as a journalist when you're 18. -- Kicking222 01:56, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as A7. "quickly gaining notoriety" is not the same as "notable". eaolson 02:45, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.