Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Vogel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep. Bad faith nom Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 17:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] John Vogel

Should be deleted due to lack of sources. Either someone should add appropriate sources or it should be deleted. MadMaxOwnz 14:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep/Close The AfD system isn't the place to chide articles about their lack of sources. The fact that he's, roughly, in charge of one of the biggest video game franchises serves as proof of notability. While, yes, the article does need some verifiable sources for the various claims it makes, that doesn't mean it should be deleted. Please see Wikipedia:Deletion policy; the article isn't hopelessly doomed to having no sources, the work just needs to be done. EVula 16:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Who will do it? Do you expect someone else to find them for you? MadMaxOwnz 16:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep It just needs to be cleaned up; not deleted. ^---SilentRAGE! 16:30, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Then feel free to clean it up. MadMaxOwnz 16:36, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Close Either find the sources or close it. MadMaxOwnz 16:33, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Cough up some sources or delete it. It is either made up or plagarized. Get the sources if it's valid information otherwise delete it.MadMaxOwnz 16:45, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Close No sources, no article. Sub Zero 4774 16:34, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Close Someone must take it upon themselves to find the sources or it should go. This information has no proof of validity. Delete it or fix it. Tundra X 16:40, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep Sockpuppetry should be a crime. Given GameFAQs user "Revelations1" posted a thread saying he'd started this [1], then TigerManXL acted like he had plus the fact Revelations1 is now asking for its deletion [2] yet here the AfD was started by MadMaxOwnz, I think we've delved into some kind of sock drawer. The article is fine, just because it's not the way you want it, don't complain and certainly don't waste people's time with things like this. It's largely thanks to you we had the Toraka/Mabus fiasco a few weeks ago, don't get petty and childish as well. --L T Dangerous 16:57, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
  • What? MadMaxOwnz 17:02, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Actually I created this article. Not you. Not anybody else. I don't even go to Gamefaqs, so um...what are you talking about???? Leave it alone and don't delete it. TigerManXL 17:09, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep This is my article and you have no right to delete it. Quit conspiring and claiming that you own it. Take this request form down now as you are all completely wrong in your antics. You have no right to delete my article. DO NOT DELETE IT TigerManXL 17:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.