Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Stear

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 21:54, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] John Stear

Despite what Google claims in its estimate, if you browse through them, you'll find only about 150 hits, many of those from his own site(s). Not notable. --Xcali 04:54, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Merge into No Answers in Genesis if this info is not there yet. -CunningLinguist 07:23, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: A skeptic. This article seems to be one of those "wikilink every proper noun" empty sets. Geogre 12:23, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Sorry, but if you're skeptical of Genesis, you are hardly alone. See atheist. Or Buddhist. Or many, many, other things, for that matter. --Scimitar 14:33, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete not notable in himself, info is already in No Answers in Genesis (is that notable?) --Doc (?) 14:44, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, as he would only be notable for founding No Answers in Genesis, and that itself is nonnotable (see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/No Answers in Genesis. Postdlf 22:44, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect into No Answers in Genesis, as per CunningLinguist. JamesBurns 06:38, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete & redirect, nothing much to merge here. Radiant_>|< 09:27, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete --Ondrejk 09:30, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with No Answers in Genesis. -- Zantastik talk 07:54, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.