Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Sickels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sr13 03:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] John Sickels

John Sickels (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Hard one to assess, this page has been speedied twice, the guy has done many things but none are supported by substantial references and there are no significant achievements. Bridgeplayer 22:34, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• Keep and cleanup. It hints of WP:AUTOism, but there are plenty of WP:RSs out there. --Evb-wiki 12:40, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
• The article looks fine now. Assuming the comments in the article are true I think this guy passes our guidlines in WP:BIO. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 14:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep but needs an external reference. DGG 22:47, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 01:19, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.