Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Monaghan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] John Monaghan

John Monaghan (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Autobiography-does not belong on wikipedia - WK:NN Renrenren 19:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC) User is editing his own page. Only link is to his personal website. His restoration initiative described on his website is interesting, but does not warrant a personal page on wikipedia. --Renrenren 20:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Delete Clear COI issue. Even of written by someone else, not notable in any real sense. Notabilty seems to be asserted by the "Certificate of Environmental Citizenship" award - I don't know, but that doesn't sound very exclusive to me. Emeraude 21:57, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete, non-notable autobiography. —Swpb talk contribs 22:15, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete obviously non-notable.--Hatch68 04:31, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete vain vanity in vain. Danny Lilithborne 11:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per complete lack of notability of this individual per nom. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nominator. Fails our Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guidelines and well as WP:V with geocities.com links and no reliable sources. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 23:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Userfy obviously this is someones autobiographical vanity bio... move it to his user page.  ALKIVAR™ ☢ 23:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
    But even if this were userfied, it would still be deleted sooner or later per WP:USER, wouldn't it? 07:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.