Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Moccia (second nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. Bucketsofg 18:09, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] John Moccia

John Moccia (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Contested prod. Serious question on Notability. There may also be issues with WP:AUTO or, at minimum, WP:COI. Despite major cleanup by author, still looks less than neutral. Fan-1967 01:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Note: This is the second nomination for an article of this title, but the earlier AFD seems to be for a different person. Fan-1967 01:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - None of this guy's associated ventures are notable, and no sources are provided per WP:BIO. — Swpb talk contribs 04:06, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unsourced, still reads like an advert. Flyingtoaster1337 08:55, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - the 300 odd web hits for "John Moccia" dont convince me this guy is notable. this appears to be the most applicable hit. John Vandenberg 09:26, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: There seem to be at least a few people of the name, including a screenwriter who wrote one episode of a TV show, so he gets a number of hits on IMDB, tv.com and mirrors. Fan-1967 15:06, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - per nom.--Wehwalt 15:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom Bucketsofg 19:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete or add proper sources by end of this AfD Alf photoman 19:53, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom ~ Joe Jklin (T C) 20:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - As mentioned bu other users it has no notability at all. Tellyaddict 21:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nomination. Philippe Beaudette 22:57, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Per above. --Sir James Paul, La gloria è a dio 00:32, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.