Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John McGuirk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:36, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] John McGuirk

Vanity article? Smitz 10:31, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per me ;) Smitz 10:31, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, smells like vanity to me, nn-bio. --Terence Ong 10:53, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. At first I thought that it would be about the soccer coach from Home Movies. -- Kjkolb 12:49, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Obvious Keep, press coverage like [1] indicates subject meets notability criteria; low-end notability is notability. Monicasdude 16:07, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Neutral, notability aside, article needs work. It has no references and needs wikification. — ApolloCreed ^{(comment) (talk)} 18:54, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. A university student who briefly worked for a political party. While he may well become notable enough for an article one day, that day has not yet arrived for mine. Capitalistroadster 21:18, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This is nn, does not meet WP:BIO; the independent press article cited above does not impress me as meeting it. -- Samir ∙ ^T_C 23:08, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete Though there is some press coverage, it's not for a terribly significant event. OhNoitsJamie^Talk 02:23, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable vanity piece. Chairman S. ^Talk 05:23, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.