Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Gillen

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 15:44, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] John Gillen

I cannot verify this, sounds supsiciously like a hoax -- Ferkelparade π 12:55, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Neither can't I. Delete unless somebody does come up with verifiable evidence. Lupo 12:58, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  Note: creator IP (134.226.1.136 is a known hoaxter. Lupo 13:47, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete: known vandal. Check user history and this page - Pete C ^(talk) 15:33, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, although I did laugh pretty hard when I read it Foodmarket 17:43, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Delete, not notable, vanity, and the anonymous author of that article vandalised my user page. Megan1967 07:32, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. A boxing "superstar" in the 16th century? I don't think so. Wmahan. 23:10, 2005 Apr 18 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.