Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Frochaux

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. No evidence that any of his bands are actually notable; none of them have Wikipedia articles (though that in itself is not proof) and most links are to myspace pages etc. No prejudice to re-creation if evidence to the contrary can be produced. ELIMINATORJR 00:29, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] John Frochaux

John Frochaux (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

While some of his bands may or may not be notable, he himself doesn't appear to be individually notable (yet) for inclusion in Wikipedia. Delete. • Lawrence Cohen 23:35, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tikiwont (talk) 10:52, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - Person is notable if is in a band that is notable --sumnjim talk with me·changes 13:56, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - I disagree with sumnjim. an individual memeber of the New York Philharmonic is unlikely to be notable enough, though the band is. Each memeber needs to establish their own notability, through substantive coverage in secondary sources. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 18:19, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment I was not talking about an orchestra, or a choir, but rather a band. WP:MUSIC states that a band is notable if at one time a member of the band was notable. If A + B = C, I don't see why B + A != C --sumnjim talk with me·changes 20:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.