Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Foley

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 19:43, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] John Foley

There is no evidence that the subject of this page exists. Further, the associated Wikiquotes are improbable and illiterate. Delete. JPF 10:55, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I agree with the other poster. The Wikiquotes look completely made up, and the bio seems fabricated. Delete. User: Polylerus 22:33, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This was improperly and not completely posted to VfD. I'm finishing the process. No vote. —Mar·ka·ci:2005-02-13 12:16 Z

• Delete --Brookie 16:37, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep- quite notable --219.78.107.115 16:40, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, self-promotion. Wyss 01:53, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Google Web turns up numerous John Foleys. At least two of them (I didn't bother going beyond the first three pages of results.) appear to pass the "average professor" test; and a third (the archbishop) could well turn out to be notable after further research. This article isn't about any of them. If it isn't rewritten to be so, Delete. Uncle G 08:59, 2005 Feb 14 (UTC)
• Delete. Hoax and/or nonnotable. Wile E. Heresiarch 01:31, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, possible hoax. Megan1967 06:09, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.