The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:42, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete, Hoax by a blocked user. Completely fails WP:V.--Isotope23 20:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete, yeah, obvious hoax. The three novels with links are by other people. DoomsDay349 21:07, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Accurizer 21:13, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Speedy delete as hoax. User's only contributions were three new articles posted on October 23, all bogus. Newyorkbrad 21:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Just a waste of bandwidth, not even funny. Tubezone 22:36, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.