Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Drury

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep. This is a non-admin closure, due to the obvious nature of it due to only having keep votes and the nominator's withdrawal. Mathmo ^Talk 22:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] John Drury

Not notable, tagged as such over 3 months ago. Fails WP:BLP due to lack of non-trivial third party sources. Burntsauce 23:41, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - I don't really see why an article should be deleted just because it is a stub. Why not just expand upon it? I just did a search on him and already found a bunch of stuff that could be added to the article. I recommend looking here. [1] Eggy49er 00:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
  • A quick note, I updated the article now and also sourced non trivial third party sources. Eggy49er 01:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - Looks notable by all the awards. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 01:29, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Withdraw nomination in light of recent improvements, the awards (which are sourced) now convince me that this passes bio guidelines. Burntsauce 18:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.