Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Dale

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 05:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] John Dale

John Dale (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Bumped from prod (concern was "Doesn't seem notable"), but with at least some source material cited this should probably get a full discussion. Procedural, I abstain. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 17:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

• Keep Notable enough for me. Xanucia 22:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Notable, good NPOV, all sides addressed, good sourcing. No opinion on John Dale himself. Bearian 23:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.