Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Daker 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 14:36, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] John Daker 2

John Daker (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not a single reliable source Hipocrite - «Talk» 17:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

See Prior Nomination. Hipocrite - «Talk» 18:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Quarl ^(talk) 06:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

• delete Wikipedia is not America's Funniest Home Videos. NN qua NN. Pete.Hurd 06:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - does not meet the notability guidelines for web content. Luke! 00:52, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep the Moorcock reference: Daker is the "original" manifestation of the Champion, and is seminally notable within the Eternal Champion mileu (which is almost all of Moorcock's oeuvre, albeit sometimes via retcon). No vote as to the amateur operatic. -- Simon Cursitor 07:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Being on a few websites and twice on TV is not enough to establish notability.--Carabinieri 18:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete No RS, so not notable... - Denny 20:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.