Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Conner 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. BD2412 T 01:58, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] John Conner

This article has been recreated and deleted a couple of times as have related items.

This appears to be a one-man "movement" eager for self-promotion. There is already a short mention at Georgia Guidestones, which should be sufficient. Will Beback 22:36, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete: per nom. --Hetar 22:44, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as per previous AfD discussions.  (aeropagitica)  22:50, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, maybe even speedily, as a recreation of deleted material. --Elkman - (talk) 22:58, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, delete, delete. Sapient 22:59, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Clearly a nut. But is his a notable nut? He did get in the news for his criticism of Jessica Simpson, but by itself I don't think that's enough. Bucketsofg 23:56, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete nn.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:30, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. The big inclusionist in me has won this round. The article is pretty well sourced and I think he is a (barely) notable enough nutcase. Grandmasterka 09:49, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to John Connor (the character from Terminator 2: Judgment Day and Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines) The current subject of this article is a nn bio and people are most likely to search his name when looking for the movie chacater (even if it is the wrong spelling). No objection to deleting history and having an admin lock the redirect to prevent reversion/recreation. youngamerican (talk) 14:33, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. If it is a 'one man movement' like a voter alleges, why are there over 300 members in The Resistance forums? Why has John Conner made international news numerous times? (ie NYPOST, Rollingstone, MSNBC, SmarMoney Magazine etc) John Conner has become a common name in the anti-new world order community,and is a more relevent topic than MANY pages on Wikipedia which have been online for a LONG TIME, with no 'votes to delete'. —This unsigned comment was added by Wikipediareader (talk • contribs) . (the author of the article)
  • Comment The subject has now placed a link on his home page asking readers to participate in the AFD. -Will Beback 22:15, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Due to my own mistake in listing this AfD, the link from the article, which was copied onto the subject's website, pointed to the old AfD. Some votes were placed at the incorrect page: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Conner#Votes intended for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Conner 2. I am not moving them here because the editing record would get muddled. -Will Beback 22:15, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. The references in the article don't really establish notability. There's a small town newspaper in Georgia. The infowars.com link is broken, the Smart Money article only references the piece in 'The Inquirer'. I am not familiar with the Inquirer or how reliable or how many hits it gets a day.Montco 03:23, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

LIARS! The Infowars link is NOT broken, you forgot the NYPOST, Rollingstone, Mike Walker Show, MSNBC, Pakistan Daily News, CNET, etc, and make it seem like 'a small town newspaper in georgia' is the only reference. You must be a bunch of homos.

UMMM....AND WHAT HAPPENED TO ALL THE OTHER VOTES?? INCLUDING MANY, MANY KEEP VOTES? AAAAHHHHH REMEMBER? IS SOMEONE TRYING TO SWAY THE 'ELECTION'  ????

  • KEEP, Let's see the 911 truth movement has Alex Jones, John Conner, many local access channel patriots, Hollywood movie stars, family members of 911 victims, former intelligence/cabinet members in both Britain and the US - but the Delete people still think its a hoax! —This unsigned comment was added by 69.47.157.200 (talk • contribs) .
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.