Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Best

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 01:30, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] John Best

John Best (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete. He's a racehorse trainer, that's all. No assertion of notability, nor evidence of it. Only source is his own website. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:40, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Not notable at all. •Malinaccier• ^T/C 02:55, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete not notable. Oysterguitarist 04:56, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as nn. Ford MF 05:59, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Usually the authors of sub-marginal articles such as this one dredge up a bunch of "awards" in order to establish the subject's notability. But apparently this is one horse trainer who hasn't even won any of those little yellow trophies with the little horsy on top. Qworty 10:26, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete BrownHairedGirl said it well in the nomination: the subject is not notable, and there is only one source; his website. Acalamari 18:02, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No apparent notability greater than the average horse trainer. --Dhartung | Talk 03:11, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.