Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johann Heinrich Zur Oeveste

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Pigman☿ 03:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Johann Heinrich Zur Oeveste

DELETE: Comment: Sieroversche (talk · contribs) See [1] [2] [3] And discussion pages Main source to this article prof. A. Holtmann does not believe in the encyclopedic value of the main character of his book "Ferner thue ich euch zu wissen ..." So for that reason it should be gone than. Regarding the other what is mentioned like a lack on sources or if it is a hoax or not true see [4] Sorry that it is in Dutch—Preceding unsigned comment added by Sieroversche (talk • contribs)

• Say what? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as it appears to be a WP:COATRACK of a [{WP:N|Non-notable]] philosphy. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 01:45, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm a little confused by the nomination, which seems to be in favor of keeping it ... or ... I don't know. The German article appears to have been deleted, and I don't see any reason not to follow suit. The only claim to notability, as a unique "Lutheran chronicler" of the era, simply isn't true. We ahve many letters and records from Luther immigrants from all walks of life and eras. Pastordavid (talk) 18:06, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Bearian'sBooties :-) Stwalkerster talk 14:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.