Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Luft

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Merge. Unfortunately nobody has said which parent to merge it into, and there's not much to merge. I'll see if I can work in a mention of him and his dob and then replace with a redirect. kingboyk 21:16, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Joey Luft

Non-notable. Random children of celebrities don't deserve their own pages, as if this precedent were consistently upheld there would be innumerable nonsubstantive stubs about un-important people who happen to descend from the famous. Ashwinr 22:54, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete not notable.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:00, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, luftcruft. Ok, sorry, had to do it. Anyway, relatives of celebrities are not notable. --Deville (Talk) 02:16, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge to parents. Clear consensus that nn relatives of notable people go in the notable person's article. Stifle 11:43, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge per Stifle. --Rory096 00:06, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that a decision may usefully be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
Stifle 14:04, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect. It's normal policy to allow a redirect for non-notable relatives. DJ Clayworth 14:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete no need to merge, there's not any notable information here to use in the articles of highly notable relatives MLA 16:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge per above. SoLando (Talk) 17:41, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and merge, as above. For great justice. 18:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge per Stifle.--Isotope23 19:24, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge per Stifle. YellowPigNowNow 23:43, 6 April 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.