Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Katzen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Joey Katzen

Joey Katzen (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

non-notable vanity bio. MPS 23:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete I am the nominator. If anything, there should be a stub on Retail Alphabet Game (currently red linked) and this katzen guy could maybe have one sentence about him. MPS 23:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - I don't think this necessarily falls afoul of WP:COI (the "vanity" policy); the original author, User:EvanFreed, has created several stub-class articles about various people. Still, I see no evidence (or assertion) of Katzen's notability. --Hyperbole 23:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete The game (which is Katzen's only claim to notability) is possibly notable enough to deserve a mention on List of Internet phenomena, but that's about it. I've had it emailed to me a number of times, so I guess it's somewhat known. As for Katzen, the most he deserves is a mention as a creator of the game, if it's deemed notable enough to be listed somewhere. Katzen's user page is his fourth Google hit, which doesn't bode well for notability. --Djrobgordon 23:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, no or limited assertion of notability. The game that he invented also isn't as notable (although it was reviewed). --Sigma 7 23:20, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. Ha ha, I completely agree that I'm non-notable. This page showed up randomly a year ago, and I've been waiting for it to be flagged and deleted since. Jkatzen 04:51, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.