Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Widzer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, except the text is copied from http://www.jetready.com/home.php. The solution is to rewrite the article from the numerous sources available. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:52, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Widzer

Widzer (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Notability is questioned.... - Philippe | Talk 05:21, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep This guy seems to be notable per USA Today and a number of other sources. Article may not be NPOV and needs improvement but the guy is notable. --Hdt83 Chat 05:32, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. This article does nothing but assert notability through the mentioning of coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources. Someguy1221 05:52, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
I see mention of outlets that have "interviewed" him, but.... I'm not sure that's real notability. Is everyone who's interviewed notable? - Philippe | Talk 06:02, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment.I think the key here is having been interviewed by multiple sources. This shows that he is considered notable enough by said sources that more than one person wants to talk to him. Someguy1221 06:07, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. This is a blatant promo piece the way it's written. It also needs to be blanked per WP:CP pending confirmation of the author's authority to use the text on the subject's website. So if you want to see it for this AfD, look in the history. -- But|seriously|folks  06:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep but rewrite as a cited stub. We don't need his PR blurb, which doesn't really even focus on his being a "travel expert". --Dhartung | Talk 09:27, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep the man seems notable because of his media appearances and coverage in USA Today. However the article needs a major re-write (based on the last archived version before the temporary blanking). Pats Sox Princess 13:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.