Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Schriner 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete No sources shown. This is the second time this has been at AFD. The absence of sources within the article is fatal. Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:20, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Joe Schriner

Joe Schriner (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No reliable sources, no notablity established tagged since August Southern Texas 04:45, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

• Keep Only if more sources are given. He seems to be a candidate in the 2008 United States presidential election which I would think would make him notable given he has a history of campaigning in different elections. If reliable sources can be found, I would say he could meet the notablity guideline. — Save_Us_229 05:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep: Needs sources. Running for president makes somebody notable, at least IMO. Rjd0060 05:19, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
• Undecided. Lots of people announce that they are running for president of the United States, but then fail to actually attempt to campaign, and they receive no independent news coverage. I don't think those people are notable. Schriner is on the borderline in that he seems to have received some news coverage, but it isn't cited in this article yet. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:42, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. There are still no independent reliable sources identified in this article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:15, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep There seem to be plenty of sources available through Google. Epbr123 11:37, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per Rjd. Ground Zero | t 12:37, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - but if there is a AFD after the end of Presidential elections, delete. Rudget _zŋ 17:08, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.