Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Cail

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 03:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Joe Cail

Joe Cail (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No google results. He is not mentioned by any other reference. All of his awards are local, inter-school awards. Alcemáe T • C 05:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete This is a no brainer. Horribly fails WP:BIO --sumnjim ^{talk with me·changes} 16:08, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. As per CSD:A7. Nothing special about him but still one blog.--Edtropolis 16:28, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Such extraordinary claims in those articles require extraordinary sources, and none can be found. Had he won all those awards, he should have at least received mentions on some educational related webpages.--Kylohk 15:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- David Eppstein 00:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- unverifiability kicks in even before lack of notability does. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 02:17, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable subject Jack1956 12:35, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per WP:NN--RandomHumanoid^(⇒) 16:27, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I think "He has received numerous awards during his tenure" is enough of an assertion of notability that we can't just speedy it, but this is not even close to passing notability. —David Eppstein 20:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.