Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joanna Eden
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep, but the sources found should be included. seresin | wasn't he just...? 20:20, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Joanna Eden
Notability, per WP:MUSIC ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 00:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Independent, reliable sources available (e.g. http://www.bbc.co.uk/essex/content/articles/2007/09/07/joanna_eden_feature.shtml , http://www.jazzcds.co.uk/artist_id_575 , http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/03/2007_20_thu.shtml). --Oldak Quill 02:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, subject has coverage in reliable secondary sources. Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC).
- Delete: Those sources are not present in the article, and the article gives us no way of assessing whether her recordings have verifiable measures of success. In fact, it says "2007 will see" her next record. As it is, it shouldn't be kept. If Oldak Quill rewrites it to be 1) NPOV and not a press release, 2) An objective assessment, 3) An article about an act rather than a feigned biography of a person, then consider my objections gone. Utgard Loki (talk) 12:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Sources have been provided that are enough to show that the article needs improvement, not deletion. Seraphim♥ Whipp 00:19, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- I added two references, and there is much information that could be added from the sources that OldakQuill provided above. It's enough to pass WP:N. Keep. --Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 03:20, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
