Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jo-Beth Casey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. -Docg 00:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jo-Beth Casey

Jo-Beth Casey (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Merge or Delete Thought not necessarily completely unnotable, this character is nowhere notable to have its own article ♣ Klptyzm Chat wit' me § Contributions ♣ 17:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Comment If you want it merged, you can do that without an AFD nomination after finding an appropriate merge target (just withdraw the nomination). If you want it deleted, you've come to the right place.--Kchase T 21:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Quarl (talk) 08:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - per WP:FICT this sort of fictional character should be housed in a list article. As there appears to be no list article for TimeSplitters characters, delete this. Otto4711 09:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Create new article and merge - create Minor characters in TimeSplitters series and move it there, along with any other minor-character articles you can find. Walton monarchist89 11:33, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Nishkid64 18:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete; if information for this character and others is desired, create a "minor characters" article and put them all there (and leave a redirect in place of this article, obviously) – Qxz 20:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Create new article and merge - Agreed that a "Minor Characters in TimeSplitters" article is the best way to go. Its notable information.......just not worthy of an article of it's own.
  • Delete for now per comments expressed above. If someone wants to create this list of video game characters, then more power to them, but it hasn't happened since this discussion has been relisted twice. If it happens in the future, we can restore the article without a trip to DRV, if the closing admin finds that was the consensus decision here. I'd be happy with merging then, too.--Kchase T 11:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.