Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiyang Chen

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Smoddy (Rabbit and pork) 20:00, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Jiyang Chen

Apparnetly a gifted young piano player, however this statment in completely unverifiable, not even a mention in a local newspaper, vanity or hoax, delete --nixie 07:20, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, not notable. Megan1967 08:35, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unless verifiable citations of note are provided. Average Earthman 12:52, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• http://www.rgj.com/news/stories/html/2005/03/03/93724.php unsigned comment by anon user:69.229.212.32
• Delete, not yet notable. Grue 17:44, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• How do I get rid of the duplicate one? Oh right, not notable because all 18 year olds can play Feux Follets. Look into this piece and tell me what you think. Please read: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.music.classical/browse_frm/thread/17749ad1604b9308/ce08904647107ab5?q=most+difficult+piece+feux+follets&rnum=1#ce08904647107ab5
  • second unsigned comment by anon user:69.229.212.32
• He seems like a very talented pianist. However, being young and talented is not sufficient all by itself for an encyclopedia article. He does not appear to meet the recommended Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/Notability and Music Guidelines. Delete unless further evidence is presented. Rossami (talk) 03:16, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - vanity/not notableTobycat 06:04, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.