Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jism2

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 08:40, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Jism2

Bollyporn. sjorford:// 22:19, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, not notable, article as it stands is un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 23:45, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• There's a reason for deletion I never expected to see. Delete, seems to be just another porn flick. -- Cyrius|✎ 02:53, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Err... delete, I guess. It looks like promo copy. — RJH 04:36, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. utcursch 12:00, Feb 13, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - another "Oh Honestly!" case of rubbish - do they have nothing better to do? The name says it all - a load of Jism! Brookie 19:58, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.