Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Smith (martial arts fighter)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 23:59, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Jimmy Smith (martial arts fighter)
Delete No encyclopedic notability proved. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 04:59, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:V and WP:BIO. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 07:35, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 19:37, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:43, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per Brewcrewer, subject appears in a non-notable tv program and has no self-notability - Dumelow (talk) 13:05, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per brew. Non-notable. — HelloAnnyong [ t · c ] 15:33, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- Don't delete -- show premieres Friday, Dec. 28. Momentum on YouTube and on message boards as people debate whether fighters are better or worse than History Channel's Human Weapon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krystynlo (talk • contribs) 21:26, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Only signs of notability include winning some seemingly minor jujitsu titles and appearing on the Carson Daly show. --Badger Drink (talk) 15:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Weak delete as appearing to fail WP:BIO.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 23:24, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.