Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Joe Roche

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 21:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jimmy Joe Roche

Jimmy Joe Roche (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Subject of article fails the guidelines for notability per WP:BIO. No major works, No major media coverage. Nv8200p talk 15:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – Alf^Photoman 15:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Well, that's different. He has an IMDB entry, but there's nothing on it! First time I've seen one like that, and I wonder how it got that way in the first place. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Comment - this is film-related only; should it be on the visual-arts related list? I'm reluctant to comment on it & hope the VA list doesn't get filled up with other cinema stuff. Johnbod 19:56, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Multimedia art is considered "visual art" Alf^Photoman 20:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

the article neither describes nor categorises him as anything other than a film-maker, but I see what you mean from the website. From the Visual arts side, he doesn't seem notable to me (yet), but he might be on the film side. Johnbod 21:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete unless someone digs up something notable on the film side. The visual art fails WP:BIO Alf^Photoman 23:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.