Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Zulevic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 02:47, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jim Zulevic

nn actor with only a couple of credits to his name. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:00, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Not sure 382 unique hits when searching for Jim Zulevic, and a search for Gayco brings back few relevant results. He does, however, have quite a few credits. Royboycrashfan 00:08, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Searching with quotes around the name comes up with 227. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:22, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep. Second City troupe member with verifiable movie credits. Where's the issue? Monicasdude 00:23, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. His IMBD entry indicates sufficient notability. dbtfztalk 00:59, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per above --TBC??? ??? ??? 01:32, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep A couple is enough, check IMDB next time. Mike (T C) 01:55, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Excuse me? What makes you think I didn't check it? Especially since the previous version of the article was a word-for-word copy of it? I still believe three very minor roles in three very minor movies is insufficient, but I will await your apology. User:Zoe|(talk) 03:00, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
      • Why exactly do I owe you an appology? He is notable IMO, thats my opinion, no appolgies for good faith opinions/comments. Mike (T C) 04:00, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Please keep your tempers in check and remain civil to your fellow Wikipedians. If you have issues to discuss, move it to user talk and out of the AfD. Thanks! Isopropyl 05:26, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
        • Sorry my fault for not explaining myself. I am not saying you nominated this in bad faith, however you said you did check the IMDB which lists 15 movie/TV roles, a director role and a writing role for a TV series but only say he has a couple, thats where I got the idea you didn't check it. Mike (T C) 19:50, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
          • Thanks, Mike, I appreciate your comments. User:Zoe|(talk) 17:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
            • The IMDB entry appears to have been substantially expanded in the last few days. Monicasdude 17:53, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Has enough of a presence in the media to support an article. --CTSWyneken 02:02, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Notable enough Celcius 02:19, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Agreed. Notable enough. --AaronS 03:02, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • keep please this person is notable erasing would not make sense Yuckfoo 03:03, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep with the reservation that it needs to be expanded to be of any importance. His parts in those movies weren't huge, and alone are probably not enough to merit inclusion. IMDB shows he did a lot more work with TV, and the article should reflect that--as well as his (apparently well-known) comedy work. Seqsea (talk) 03:33, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep I also think he is notable enough; he's done work with Second City, and he has some film and TV credits. As an aside, be nice :) -- Samir ∙ TC 05:31, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I agree with Zoe. We have enough comedians already. Just because the company you work for happens to be more publicized than others doesn't mean you're important. Seeing how he's dead, I doubt there's much likelihood of expansion. -Wiccan Quagga 06:25, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - I'm going to try to make some improvements to the article. dbtfztalk 06:43, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Jimboy0 06:55, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. IMDB entry shows a reasonably notable record. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:31, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Article is beginning to take shape and makes a fair claim to notability. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:33, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep for obvious reasons, already stated. --Rob 08:24, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, notable. --Terence Ong 10:04, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, clearly notable. Appeared in five films, directed one, in addition to appearances in several TV shows and TV movies. Angr/talk 11:01, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep notable. --Siva1979Talk to me 16:37, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Sounds like most of those appearances are bit parts, barely credited. Certainly not staring roles. Regards, Ben Aveling
  • Keep obviously notable. "We have enough comedians already" made me laugh. Lets put a cap on American Idol winners as well. savidan(talk) (e@) 18:33, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep notable (WP threshold is low, and I think he meets it) Slowmover 19:44, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep as notable enough —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Staxringold (talk • contribs) .
  • Keep Per IMDB AdamJacobMuller 03:07, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.